A rough and ready presentation on agile governance

I recently gave a presentation on agile governance at a Gartner conference in Australia.

A couple of people asked for a copy of my slides – but they don’t make a lot of sense without some explanation, so I created a short video of the presentation:

The original scrappy version is here  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vLf1RFwQpFc&feature=youtu.be

A cleaned-up, slightly refined version is here: http://vimeo.com/117433763

The good news is that I did it in one take with just my new Nexus tablet as recording equipment and Powerpoint as a publishing medium. Of course the bad news is that you can probably tell this is true by the product quality.

Advertisements

The humble trade-off matrix

I have been doing some business analyst training recently and I spoke about a “trade-off matrix” a couple of times. A couple of people have asked for a good link to explain what one is and why they are so cool. So I looked on the web and couldn’t find anything decent enough to send through.

So I thought I would describe what a trade-off matrix is here. I will also briefly mention why they are useful and then mention a couple of variations that people might not have heard of.

Continue reading “The humble trade-off matrix”

The dark art of office politics for IT leaders (part one – why is it stressful?)

Apparently office politics is a horrible thing that other people do.

But many of the emerging IT leaders I speak to get told they need to be better at “soft skills” and “influencing at a senior level”.  What this often means is get good a politics.

Sadly a lot of office politics seems to involve people playing games to get their own way at the expense of everyone else. This skill can be learned and might seem useful, but it is not what I am going to talk about here.  I am going to talk about “how do the good guys get the right outcomes when people have competing interests or needs and some people seem like knob-heads”.

Continue reading “The dark art of office politics for IT leaders (part one – why is it stressful?)”

Stealing ideas from Stand Back and Deliver

I am running an “advanced BA course” next week and as part of the course we will be exploring the concept of strategy from a business analysts point of view.

One of the trainers I work with (Shane) recommended we provide the participants with a book called “Stand Back and Deliver” by Pollyanna Pixton, Niel Nickolaisen, Todd Little and Kent McDonald.

Continue reading “Stealing ideas from Stand Back and Deliver”

Would you hire a project manager to plant a tree?

Many great ideas fall on deaf ears. So organisations bring in project managers to make sure we implement good ideas properly.

Good project managers define and clarify the idea, break the idea into features and then deploy the features into production. But quite often, people just don’t make use of the shiny new features they have been given.

Which is another way of saying that the great idea fell on deaf ears. So some organisations bring in change managers (and trainers and technical writers) to make sure people understand the new idea.

Good change managers make sure that the project is visible to stakeholders, supported by the important stakeholders and that the features being deployed are explained properly to the users. But quite often, the users go back to their old ways after a week, or they complain about the new features and the “stupid” projects that created them.

Which is another way of saying that the great idea fell on deaf ears.  So what goes wrong? Why do so many good ideas fail to get adopted?

Continue reading “Would you hire a project manager to plant a tree?”

The one thing you can’t outsource is innovation – or is it?

This blog is normally a collection of my own thoughts rather than a source for links to other people’s thinking.

But it seems a lot of companies are now deliberately asking others to do their thinking for them, so it seems fair enough for me to do the same.

Here is an interesting link to an article on crowdsourcing.

http://knowledge.asb.unsw.edu.au/article.cfm?articleId=1202

So my question is – if you can even outsource your thinking, what does it mean to be an organisation in the new world order?

The “what would someone else suggest” technique

Today I ran a workshop on workshops and predictably one of the things we did was brainstorming.

But one of the participants was a little bit bored with putting post-it notes on the wall, so we replaced our standard brainstorming with “what would someone else do””.

This approach can work really well in either a coaching session or a workshop.

The idea is that if we already knew what to do about something there would be no issue and no need for coaching or a workshop. So rather than asking “what can we do” and being stuck with our usual thinking we ask “what would someone else do”.

For example, I might ask you to answer the following questions to shift your thinking:

  • What would you never do that someone else might try?
  • What would your parents do?
  • What would a leprechaun try?
  • If we just found out out competitor had solved that problem, what would they have done?
  • What would your evil twin do?
  • How would Buffy the Vampire Slayer deal with that?  What about Spike?
  • What would never work?
  • If you were back at school, what would your friends have told you to do?
  • What would you tell someone to do?
  • What would Homer Simpson never think to do?

The aim is actually to ask more than 7 odd ways of solving the problem that we would not normally think of doing.  The reason for trying more than 7 is that someone told me that the first few approaches we think of are often repeats of the same ones … plus 7 is a lucky number.

But in our workshop one of the crew was a more inventive.  This is what he did:

  • Break people into teams of two;
  • Allocate a fictional (or famous) person to each group;
  • Give people to brainstorm some suggestions their fictional person might come up with;
  • Share the ideas with the group; and
  • Ask people to state how they could combine different combinations of the suggestions to come up with something that is actually sensible.

It worked really well in the group.  The only improvement I thought might work well for next time was to consider using some deliberately different characters to find some extreme suggestions, for example:

  • One team be Santa Clause and the other Scrooge; or
  • One team be Britney Spears and the other my great grandma.

Try one of these approaches next time you are stuck for ideas and let me know if it works.