I just finished an article on assessing the likelihood that a team will successfully adopt a change, such as a new process. So this arrtice provides an example of how the approach I discussed might work in practice.
Lets say that my client, Jenny, wants to implement “Agile practices” in her organisation. So she buys offers me a cup of coffee in return for a 20 minute consultation.
Continue reading “Assessing a team’s readiness to adopt agile practices over coffee”
I have just written a couple of articles about understanding a team’s existing world. But how does that relate to the likelihood of a new initiative being adopted?
How do we actually know if a particular group will accept, adopt and sustain a new way of working? And what can we do to increase the likelihood of successfully implementing the change?
Continue reading “Rating a team’s readiness for change”
I recently explained the “Arenas of Change” approach that I often use to understand a team and its environment. So I thought it might be a good time to discuss another approach that I often use – the 7-S framework developed by McKinsey Consulting.
Continue reading “The 7-S framework (+2) for evaluating change readiness”
To communicate effectively, you should align your message to your audience. And to drive effective change, you should align your change to the drivers and constraints faced by those you are planning to impact.
But, as I discuss in a long-winded recent article, that is easier said than done. And unfortunately my solution here is just as long-winded as the last article.
Continue reading “The Arenas of Change for assessing change readiness”
When I first got involved in projects, I used to get frustrated that people so often did the opposite of what was needed. We would roll out a new tool, and they would go back to manual processing; we would roll out a new process, and they would go back to making errors and causing themselves problems.
Continue reading “Is change hard because people are stupid?”
If you have been reading my blog, you have probably heard just about all you want to hear about logic for a while. But I suffer from the opposite problem – Logic-o-philia (not a real word).
But a comment on a recent article reminded me that I can be completely logical, and still not get my message across, if what I am saying is inconsistent with what people already think.
Continue reading “It may be logical, but does it make sense?”
I was talking about assessing documents (and statements) to see whether they are “logical”.
Critics of “logical communication” will quite rightly make the point that a document can be logical, but boring, irrelevant and completely un-compelling. This is true and I should get to talking about it soon.
But before I do I wanted to talk about “Bad logic”.
Continue reading “Bad logic. Some common fallacies”
In my last article (“Is that logical?”) I discussed a way to test the logic of a statement. But a document filled with logical statements can still be gobbledegook if the statements are not linked together logically.
So how can we assess the overall logic of a document?
Continue reading “Assessing the logic of a whole document”
(Editors note – this is not the article I promised to write on “Arenas of Change” – I got distracted by the wondrous world of logic).
I promised a class that I would write something on “The Arenas of Change”, which is a theory about how teams interpret reality.
Continue reading “Is that logical?”