<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for James King</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kingsinsight.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kingsinsight.com</link>
	<description>What you do next matters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:18:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Succession planning as an idea whose time has come by James King</title>
		<link>http://kingsinsight.com/2012/02/09/succession-planning-as-an-idea-whose-time-has-come/#comment-363</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James King]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://kingsinsight.wordpress.com/?p=621#comment-363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good point.  I have often met people who think they have mastered their role, but don&#039;t really seem to do it very well. And surprisingly I have found the opposite just as often - people who are not very confident but are actually exceptional.  That topic is definitely a rich one for development discussions and succession planning]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point.  I have often met people who think they have mastered their role, but don&#8217;t really seem to do it very well. And surprisingly I have found the opposite just as often &#8211; people who are not very confident but are actually exceptional.  That topic is definitely a rich one for development discussions and succession planning</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Succession planning as an idea whose time has come by Trent Brown</title>
		<link>http://kingsinsight.com/2012/02/09/succession-planning-as-an-idea-whose-time-has-come/#comment-362</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Trent Brown]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://kingsinsight.wordpress.com/?p=621#comment-362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[James another question of relevance is &#039;how experienced do they think they are in the role?&#039; often people&#039;s perception of themselves is different to others, often despite feedback to contrary (positive and negative). This can affect retention and people comfort in taking a higher role. Personally I have had both senarios and of them often the people without the belief in themselves and their skills are the harder ones to convince and the greatest risk in succession planning.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James another question of relevance is &#8216;how experienced do they think they are in the role?&#8217; often people&#8217;s perception of themselves is different to others, often despite feedback to contrary (positive and negative). This can affect retention and people comfort in taking a higher role. Personally I have had both senarios and of them often the people without the belief in themselves and their skills are the harder ones to convince and the greatest risk in succession planning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A project charter for lazy teams by Captain Crom</title>
		<link>http://kingsinsight.com/2012/02/06/a-project-charter-for-lazy-teams/#comment-361</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Captain Crom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 10:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://kingsinsight.wordpress.com/?p=601#comment-361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great stuff - thanks James :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great stuff &#8211; thanks James <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A simple product summary to help requirements by Regression testing &#8211; day 1 &#171; James King</title>
		<link>http://kingsinsight.com/2012/02/06/a-simple-product-summary-to-help-requirements/#comment-360</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Regression testing &#8211; day 1 &#171; James King]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 23:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://kingsinsight.wordpress.com/?p=597#comment-360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] down and discuss the users of the system you are building and the product you are [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] down and discuss the users of the system you are building and the product you are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on User stories for production support part 2: PAC by Regression testing &#8211; day 1 &#171; James King</title>
		<link>http://kingsinsight.com/2012/01/30/user-stories-for-production-support-part-2-pac/#comment-359</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Regression testing &#8211; day 1 &#171; James King]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 23:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kingsinsight.com/?p=583#comment-359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] down and discuss the users of the system you are building and the product you are [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] down and discuss the users of the system you are building and the product you are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A project charter for lazy teams by Regression testing &#8211; day 1 &#171; James King</title>
		<link>http://kingsinsight.com/2012/02/06/a-project-charter-for-lazy-teams/#comment-358</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Regression testing &#8211; day 1 &#171; James King]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 23:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://kingsinsight.wordpress.com/?p=601#comment-358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the project charter if there is one, otherwise sit down and create [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the project charter if there is one, otherwise sit down and create [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scenario testing the cycle of pain for regression testing by Regression testing &#8211; day 1 &#171; James King</title>
		<link>http://kingsinsight.com/2012/02/03/scenario-testing-the-cycle-of-pain-for-regression-testing/#comment-357</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Regression testing &#8211; day 1 &#171; James King]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 23:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://kingsinsight.wordpress.com/?p=593#comment-357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] testing is the easy part of IT development, not the horrible monster some people think it has to [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] testing is the easy part of IT development, not the horrible monster some people think it has to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Making regression testing suck less and yet be more effective &#8211; exploratory testing by An international standard for being stupid? The mistakes users always make &#171; James King</title>
		<link>http://kingsinsight.com/2012/01/30/making-regression-testing-suck-less-and-yet-be-more-effective-exploratory-testing/#comment-356</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[An international standard for being stupid? The mistakes users always make &#171; James King]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 22:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kingsinsight.com/?p=579#comment-356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] I would like assume every developer, BA and tester would do some simple exploratory testing  as they add features and I would assume that every team would do some regular regression testing as [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I would like assume every developer, BA and tester would do some simple exploratory testing  as they add features and I would assume that every team would do some regular regression testing as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scenario testing the cycle of pain for regression testing by An international standard for being stupid? The mistakes users always make &#171; James King</title>
		<link>http://kingsinsight.com/2012/02/03/scenario-testing-the-cycle-of-pain-for-regression-testing/#comment-355</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[An international standard for being stupid? The mistakes users always make &#171; James King]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://kingsinsight.wordpress.com/?p=593#comment-355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] find that even though I am not a tester, I can often break applications in regression testing by assuming my users will comply with the standard for being stupid at least once or [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] find that even though I am not a tester, I can often break applications in regression testing by assuming my users will comply with the standard for being stupid at least once or [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An international standard for being scared? by An international standard for being stupid? The mistakes users always make &#171; James King</title>
		<link>http://kingsinsight.com/2011/11/04/an-international-standard-for-being-scared/#comment-354</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[An international standard for being stupid? The mistakes users always make &#171; James King]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kingsinsight.com/?p=566#comment-354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] occur in the process when one of the things happened in the list. So I combined this with the “international standard for being scared” (FMEA) to find I could tear most processes apart and find errors really [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] occur in the process when one of the things happened in the list. So I combined this with the “international standard for being scared” (FMEA) to find I could tear most processes apart and find errors really [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

